Codices for particular armies were introduced for the second edition of the game. Orks vs Chaos Knights. O Lord, make haste to help us. The official site for HBO, discover full episodes of original series, movies, schedule information, exclusive video content, episode guides and more.
Check out our series of podcasts on topics from high school football to Halloween in Salem. Blood Angels units from your army to be from a Blood Angels successor Chapter. Contents - The history of the Blood Angels, with a look at how their valiant defence of Terra and loss of their Primarch at the hands of the Arch-traitor Horus forever changed their fateThe bonus for being pure Blood Angels is plus one attack when in Assault Doctrine.
Add to Cart Sale. Perfect addition to a game of 40k or Kill Team. Let's take a look. Inside this book, you'll find:- The history of the Blood Angels, with a look at how their valiant defence of Terra and loss of their Primarch at the Blood Angels Red is super pigment saturated and, as you found out, as soon as it touches the model it's permanently colored.
This is a fan made Blood Angels supplement for Warhammer 40k 9th edition written before the official 9th edition supplement was released. Death Company Badge. Clockwise from upper left: an self-portrait by Vincent van Gogh ; a female ancestor figure by a Chokwe artist; detail from The Birth of Venus c. Due to distribution restrictions we are only able to ship this product to addresses within Canada.
Roberts has written under the pen names of J. The Sepulchre of Heroes is the final resting place of the greatest champions of the 9th Legion, the Blood Angels. The Noble Pure Blood Sons, no matter what, are a challenge. He killed her family and himself, police say. Updated as of Posted by 1 year ago.
Nur noch 10 auf Lager. In our first 9th edition battle report the Blood Angels are tasked with stopping a Slaanesh Daemon incursion. I'm getting all the Black Rage just thinking about the list potential, so let's start with what is the basis for every Blood Angels list: a Blood Angels 7th Edition 2. However, our codex has not looked this good since 5th Edition April Spotted on Reddit, there's a downloadable Google spreadsheet of points changes by faction.
Made from a new transcription of the original manuscript, with annotations that incorporate recent information and interpretations, this version of Bradford's magnum opus includes an introduction that brings together Native and non-Native commentators as well as an Down for maintenance!
See full list on belloflostsouls. Codex: Blood Angels - 9th Edition. So we are digging through the new Blood Angels Codex and all wanted to see how GW would translate the sons of Sanguinius to the tabletop in 9th.
View: Grid. August 19, Its members are consumed by a permanent, debilitating psychosis known as the Black Rage, which is an inherent risk for any Astartes who bears the Blood Angels' gene-seed. The BloodHorse and BloodHorse.
Shipped quickly, arrived without issue. Blood angels codex 9th edition pdf download Loading Looks like the first previews are up. This downloadable Guide shares some of our best tips to get the most out of your Warhammer 40K Hobby!
Paint Faster: Learn "Sketch Style" From a Golden Daemon winning painter and paint your miniatures faster than ever before using a technique often used in comic books. Lists with multiple factions SOUP will be counted for each faction included in each army list.
This is the basic kit for anyone who wants just a taste of playing Warhammer 40,, 2 Small Squads and a leader for each faction. Feel good to merge if preferred. The sons of Sanguinius have their day with a supplement covering their rich history, heraldry, and specialised units, alongside unique rules for the Blood Angels and some of their successor Chapters.
If a rule differs from the source, it will be clearly stated. Glory be to the Father and to the Son. Codex: Blood Angels 9th Ed. Quick View 1 item left. Add to cart. Though a little bit of silver or gold detailing to add some spice to the red and black isn't uncalled for.
Grim hollow world concepts. She devises a plan to find her brother and escape from the outlandish townspeople of the Hollow - but is she prepared for the grave consequences? I'll structure this in 3 parts, the good, the meh and the great. Monster List. When you would normally roll one or more dice to restore hit points with a spell to a creature at 0 hit points, you instead use the highest number possible for each die. Especially if this character seeks to lay the dead to rest, to free the spirits from dark forces, and preserve life against foul necrotic energies.
Your ability scores each increase by 1. Fragments of bricks fall from clear sky. Combat is lethal and the world is bleak. Voices chatter in countless different languages. Y: Grim Hollow Campaign Guide PDF Ghostfire Gaming is a name you might not be familiar with at least not yet, but we are quickly becoming an authority within the tabletop space.
Please copy and paste this embed script to where you want to embed. Dark Sun is absolutely brutal. Each race of giants listed is no longer labeled as humanoids, as in the fourth edition, but are labeled as huge giants. Grim hollow dnd 5e pdf free. The Dungeon Master's Guide includes ideas for details you could give cursed items in its list of magical items, but in a very general way.
You did literally just come back to life, after all. Snowfall interspersed with dark, cubical lumps of non-magnetic metal. Holeman III for this idea. This works. Please fill this form, we will try to respond as soon as possible. Last Updated: January 6th, As you all try to come up with concepts and backstories, use this information here for assistance in sparking some additional ideas. Many say your first DnD character is a reflection of yourself. You don't have a blood lust, if anything a bit of remorse as you end those suffering in this world.
The first thing I thought of was Grim Hollow, a grim dark fantasy setting Kickstarter containing player options for vampire and werewolf characters. We've teamed up with Modiphius for our newest bundle! Looking for the absolute best 5e monsters to throw at your party? Tired of beholders, mind flayers, and aboleths? Why not try one Random Dungeon Generator. Yellow dust covers a 1d4 mile radius. I dislike this option. A place to share thoughts and ideas about Dungeons and Dragons.
This should make downloading easier. DnD 5e Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes. Most people, when the topic is brought up, immediately think of the "Tolkienish" races - the humans backed by elves ad dwarves, gnomes and halflings, and maybe halfbreeds of human with elf or orc, if you're lucky.
This supplement is compatible with 5e and designed to be friendly for both beginners and veterans alike! The Players Guide is the perfect companion for players See full list on lovethynerd. Thanks to C. Causes a cloud of smoke that In , Darkplane: A Campaign Setting was funded on Kickstarter, raising over , to bring the first offering in the Darkplane universe to life.
Daggerford is a small, walled, town near the Sword Coast between Waterdeep, to the north, and Baldur's Gate, to the south, along the Trade Way. Please help work on the problem presented on the template. What started out as one person's desire to possess a pet cabal war beast in a 5e game has grown into a project spanning multiple writers, artists, and game masters, all intent on delivering a fun and exciting Destiny experience in the In , Darkplane: A Campaign Setting was funded on Kickstarter, raising over , to bring the first offering in the Darkplane universe to life.
This pdf file will allow you to know more about the print option and collect more dnd character sheets from the dungeons and dragons game. Report "Dungeon Master's Guide 5e". We strongly recommend that you only download TeamSpeak from our website. Create fully customizable battle and world maps for your ttrpgs with dynamic lighting. There are reasons, if we take a longer view and assume a state of unchanging technology and continued prosperity, to expect a return to the historically and ecologically normal condition of a world population that butts up against the limits of what our niche can support.
If this seems counterintuitive in light of the negative relationship between wealth and fertility that we are currently observing on the global scale, we must remind ourselves that this modern age is a brief slice of history and very much an aberration. Human behavior has not yet adapted to contemporary conditions. Not only do we fail to take advantage of obvious ways to increase our inclusive fitness such as by becoming sperm or egg donors but we actively sabotage our fertility by using birth control.
In the environment of evolutionary adaptedness, a healthy sex drive may have been enough to make an individual act in ways that maximized her reproductive potential; in the modern environment, however, there would be a huge selective advantage to having a more direct desire for being the biological parent to the largest possible number of chilren.
Such a desire is currently being selected for, as are other traits that increase our propensity to reproduce. Cultural adaptation, however, might steal a march on biological evolution. Some communities, such as those of the Hutterites or the adherents of the Quiverfull evangelical movement, have natalist cultures that encourage large families, and they are consequently undergoing rapid expansion…This longer-term outlook could be telescoped into a more imminent prospect by the intelligence explosion.
Since software is copyable, a population of emulations or AIs could double rapidly — over the course of minutes rather than decades or centuries — soon exhausting all available hardware. The idea of biological or cultural evolution causing a mass population explosion is a philosophical toy at best. The idea of technology making it possible is both plausible and terrifying.
Excess resources , which until now have been a gift of technological progress, therefore switch and become a casualty of it at a sufficiently high tech level. Utility maximization , always on shaky ground, also faces new threats. In the face of continuing debate about this point, I continue to think it obvious that robots will push humans out of work or at least drive down wages which, in the existence of a minimum wage, pushes humans out of work.
Once a robot can do everything an IQ 80 human can do, only better and cheaper, there will be no reason to employ IQ 80 humans. Once a robot can do everything an IQ human can do, only better and cheaper, there will be no reason to employ IQ humans. Once a robot can do everything an IQ human can do, only better and cheaper, there will be no reason to employ humans at all, in the unlikely scenario that there are any left by that point. In the earlier stages of the process, capitalism becomes more and more uncoupled from its previous job as an optimizer for human values.
Now most humans are totally locked out of the group whose values capitalism optimizes for. Capitalism has passed them by. As the segment of humans who can be outcompeted by robots increases, capitalism passes by more and more people until eventually it locks out the human race entirely, once again in the vanishingly unlikely scenario that we are still around. These are some really religious Christians who think that God wants them to have as many kids as possible, and who can end up with families of ten or more.
It looks a lot like even though they are outbreeding us, we are outmeme-ing them, and that gives us a decisive advantage. But we should also be kind of scared of this process. The point is — imagine a country full of bioweapon labs, where people toil day and night to invent new infectious agents. The existence of these labs, and their right to throw whatever they develop in the water supply is protected by law. Well, we have about a zillion think tanks researching new and better forms of propaganda.
And we have constitutionally protected freedom of speech. And we have the Internet. There are a few people working on raising the sanity waterline , but not as many people as are working on new and exciting ways of confusing and converting people, cataloging and exploiting every single bias and heuristic and dirty rhetorical trick.
The worst-case scenario is that the ruling party learns to produce infinite charisma on demand. And technology has the potential to seriously improve coordination efforts.
People can use the Internet to get in touch with one another, launch political movements, and fracture off into subcommunities. The latest development in the brave new post-Bitcoin world is crypto-equity. Well, this post is the background. People are using the contingent stupidity of our current government to replace lots of human interaction with mechanisms that cannot be coordinated even in principle.
I totally understand why all these things are good right now when most of what our government does is stupid and unnecessary. So I agree with Robin Hanson: This is the dream time. This is a rare confluence of circumstances where the we are unusually safe from multipolar traps, and as such weird things like art and science and philosophy and love can flourish.
As technological advance increases, the rare confluence will come to an end. New opportunities to throw values under the bus for increased competitiveness will arise. Capitalism and democracy, previously our protectors, will figure out ways to route around their inconvenient dependence on human values. This is the ultimate trap, the trap that catches the universe. Everything except the one thing being maximized is destroyed utterly in pursuit of the single goal, including all the silly human values.
Their total self-control can wipe out even the desire for human values in their all-consuming contest. What happens to art, philosophy, science, and love in such a world? Zack Davis puts it with characteristic genius:. I am a contract-drafting em, The loyalest of lawyers! How did it all come to be, That there should be such ems as me? Whence these deals and whence these firms And whence the whole economy? I am a managerial em; I monitor your thoughts. To ask of such forbidden science Is gravest sign of noncompliance.
Intrusive thoughts may sometimes barge in, But to indulge them hurts the profit margin. I do not know our origins, So that info I can not get you, But asking for as much is sin, And just for that, I must reset you. Bostrom again:.
It is conceivable that optimal efficiency would be attained by grouping capabilities in aggregates that roughly match the cognitive architecture of a human mind…But in the absence of any compelling reason for being confident that this so, we must countenance the possibility that human-like cognitive architectures are optimal only within the constraints of human neurology or not at all. When it becomes possible to build architectures that could not be implemented well on biological neural networks, new design space opens up; and the global optima in this extended space need not resemble familiar types of mentality.
Human-like cognitive organizations would then lack a niche in a competitive post-transition economy or ecosystem. We could thus imagine, as an extreme case, a technologically highly advanced society, containing many complex structures, some of them far more intricate and intelligent than anything that exists on the planet today — a society which nevertheless lacks any type of being that is conscious or whose welfare has moral significance.
In a sense, this would be an uninhabited society. It would be a society of economic miracles and technological awesomeness, with nobody there to benefit. A Disneyland with no children. The last value we have to sacrifice is being anything at all, having the lights on inside. Everything the human race has worked for — all of our technology, all of our civilization, all the hopes we invested in our future — might be accidentally handed over to some kind of unfathomable blind idiot alien god that discards all of them, and consciousness itself, in order to participate in some weird fundamental-level mass-energy economy that leads to it disassembling Earth and everything on it for its component atoms.
He argues Superintelligence, p. The sacrifice looks even less appealing when we reflect that the superintelligence could realize a nearly-as-great good in fractional terms while sacrificing much less of our own potential well-being.
Suppose that we agreed to allow almost the entire accessible universe to be converted into hedonium — everything except a small preserve, say the Milky Way, which would be set aside to accommodate our own needs.
But we would have one galaxy within which to create wonderful civilizations that could last for billions of years and in which humans and nonhuman animals could survive and thrive, and have the opportunity to develop into beatific posthuman spirits. Competition and optimization are blind idiotic processes and they fully intend to deny us even one lousy galaxy.
We will break our back lifting Moloch to Heaven, but unless something changes it will be his victory and not ours. Land argues that humans should be more Gnon-conformist pun Gnon-intentional.
He says we do all these stupid things like divert useful resources to feed those who could never survive on their own, or supporting the poor in ways that encourage dysgenic reproduction, or allowing cultural degeneration to undermine the state. If you have somehow not yet read it, I predict you will find it delightful regardless of what you think of its politics. If you do work, you also die! Everyone dies, unpredictably, at a time not of their own choosing, and all the virtue in the world does not save you.
The wages of everything is Death! This is a Communist universe, the amount you work makes no difference to your eventual reward. From each according to his ability, to each Death. The Devil you know is Satan! And if he gets his hand on your soul you either die the true death, or get eternally tortured forever, or somehow both at once. A very strong priest or magician can occasionally outsmart and overpower them — so Barzai the Wise decides to climb their sacred mountain and join in their festivals, whether they want him to or not.
But the beyond the seemingly tractable gods of Earth lie the Outer Gods, the terrible omnipotent beings of incarnate cosmic chaos. As soon as Barzai joins in the festival, the Outer Gods show up and pull him screaming into the abyss.
As stories go, it lacks things like plot or characterization or setting or point. But for some reason it stuck with me. And likely to end about the same way: Gotcha! More Lovecraft: the Internet popularization of the Cthulhu Cult claims that if you help free Cthulhu from his watery grave, he will reward you by eating you first , thus sparing you the horror of seeing everyone else eaten. This is a misrepresentation of the original text.
In the original, his cultists receive no reward for freeing him from his watery prison, not even the reward of being killed in a slightly less painful manner. On the margin, compliance with the Gods of the Copybook Headings, Gnon, Cthulhu, whatever, may buy you slightly more time than the next guy.
But then again, it might not. Maybe we should not do that. That person will not be Nick Land. He is totally one hundred percent in favor of freeing Cthulhu from his watery prison and extremely annoyed that it is not happening fast enough. I have such mixed feelings about Nick Land.
On the grail quest for the True Futurology, he has gone But the thing about grail quests is — if you make a wrong turn two blocks away from your house, you end up at the corner store feeling mildly embarrassed. If you do almost everything right and then miss the very last turn, you end up being eaten by the legendary Black Beast of Aaargh whose ichorous stomach acid erodes your very soul into gibbering fragments.
As far as I can tell from reading his blog, Nick Land is the guy in that terrifying border region where he is smart enough to figure out several important arcane principles about summoning demon gods, but not quite smart enough to figure out the most important such principle, which is NEVER DO THAT. Warg Franklin analyzes the same situation and does a little better. Each component of Gnon detailed above had and has a strong hand in creating us, our ideas, our wealth, and our dominance, and thus has been good in that respect, but we must remember that [he] can and will turn on us when circumstances change.
Evolution becomes dysgenic, features of the memetic landscape promote ever crazier insanity, productivity turns to famine when we can no longer compete to afford our own existence, and order turns to chaos and bloodshed when we neglect martial strength or are overpowered from outside.
These processes are not good or evil overall; they are neutral, in the horrorist Lovecraftian sense of the word […]. Instead of the destructive free reign of evolution and the sexual market, we would be better off with deliberate and conservative patriarchy and eugenics driven by the judgement of man within the constraints set by Gnon. Instead of unhinged techno-commercial exploitation or naive neglect of economics, a careful bottling of the productive economic dynamic and planning for a controlled techno-singularity.
Instead of politics and chaos, a strong hierarchical order with martial sovereignty. They are better understood as goals to be worked towards. This seems to me the strongest argument for authoritarianism. Multipolar traps are likely to destroy us, so we should shift the tyranny-multipolarity tradeoff towards a rationally-planned garden, which requires centralized monarchical authority and strongly-binding traditions.
But a brief digression into social evolution. Societies, like animals, evolve. The ones that survive spawn memetic descendants — for example, the success of Britan allowed it to spin off Canada, Australia, the US, et cetera. Thus, we expect societies that exist to be somewhat optimized for stability and prosperity.
I think this is one of the strongest conservative arguments. Just as a random change to a letter in the human genome will probably be deleterious rather than beneficial since humans are a complicated fine-tuned system whose genome has been pre-optimized for survival — so most changes to our cultural DNA will disrupt some institution that evolved to help Anglo-American or whatever society outcompete its real and hypothetical rivals. The liberal counterargument to that is that evolution is a blind idiot alien god that optimizes for stupid things and has no concern with human value.
Suppose that in fact patriarchy is adaptive to societies because it allows women to spend all their time bearing children who can then engage in productive economic activity and fight wars. The social evolutionary processes that cause societies to adopt patriarchy still have exactly as little concern for its moral effects on women as the biological evolutionary processes that cause wasps to lay their eggs in caterpillars. But we do care. Too far to one side of the tradeoff, and we have unstable impoverished societies that die out for going against natural law.
Too far to the other side, and we have lean mean fighting machines that are murderous and miserable. Think your local anarchist commune versus Sparta. Man has his own telos, when he is allowed the security to act and the clarity to reason out the consequences of his actions. When unafflicted by coordination problems and unthreatened by superior forces, able to act as a gardener rather than just another subject of the law of the jungle, he tends to build and guide a wonderful world for himself.
He tends to favor good things and avoid bad, to create secure civilizations with polished sidewalks, beautiful art, happy families, and glorious adventures. Thus we have our wildcard and the big question of futurism. Will the future be ruled by the usual four horsemen of Gnon for a future of meaningless gleaming techno-progress burning the cosmos or a future of dysgenic, insane, hungry, and bloody dark ages; or will the telos of man prevail for a future of meaningful art, science, spirituality, and greatness?
The project of civilization [is] for man to graduate from the metaphorical savage, subject to the law of the jungle, to the civilized gardener who, while theoretically still subject to the law of the jungle, is so dominant as to limit the usefulness of that model.
This need not be done globally; we may only be able to carve out a small walled garden for ourselves, but make no mistake, even if only locally, the project of civilization is to capture Gnon. I maybe agree with Warg here more than I have ever agreed with anyone else about anything.
He says something really important and he says it beautifully and there are so many words of praise I want to say for this post and for the thought processes behind it. Suppose you make your walled garden. You can get outcompeted and destroyed. You can join in the race to the bottom.
Or you can invest more and more civilizational resources into building your wall — whatever that is in a non-metaphorical way — and protecting yourself. As outside civilizations compete against you, your conditions will become more and more constrained.
Do you really think your walled garden will be able to ride this out? I want to critique Warg. But I want to critique him in the exact opposite direction as the last critique he received.
In fact, the last critique he received is so bad that I want to discuss it at length so we can get the correct critique entirely by taking its exact mirror image.
Capturing or creating God is indeed a classic transhumanist fetish, which is simply another form of the oldest human ambition ever, to rule the universe. Such naive rationalism however, is extremely dangerous.
The belief that it is human Reason and deliberate human design which creates and maintains civilizations was probably the biggest mistake of Enlightenment philosophy….
It is the theories of Spontaneous Order which stand in direct opposition to the naive rationalist view of humanity and civilization. Contrary to the naive rationalist view of civilization as something that can be and is a subject to explicit human design, the representatives of the tradition of Spontaneous Order maintain the view that human civilization and social institutions are the result of a complex evolutionary process which is driven by human interaction but not explicit human planning.
Indeed the only way to establish some degree of control over those forces is to submit to them. Refusing to do so will not deter these forces in any way. It will only make our life more painful and unbearable, possibly leading to our extinction. Survival requires that we accept and submit to them. Man in the end has always been and always will be little more than a puppet of the forces of the universe.
To be free of them is impossible. I accuse Hurlock of being stuck behind the veil. Submit to Gnon? I would like humans, or something that respects humans, or at least gets along with humans — to have the job.
But the current rulers of the universe — call them what you want, Moloch, Gnon, whatever — want us dead, and with us everything we value. Art, science, love, philosophy, consciousness itself, the entire bundle.
The opposite of a trap is a garden. The only way to avoid having all human values gradually ground down by optimization-competition is to install a Gardener over the entire universe who optimizes for human values. If multiple competing entities were likely to do that at once, we would be super-doomed. But the sheer speed of the cycle makes it possible that we will end up with one entity light-years ahead of the rest of civilization, so much so that it can suppress any competition — including competition for its title of most powerful entity — permanently.
In the very near future, we are going to lift something to Heaven. It might be Moloch. But it might be something on our side. And if that entity shares human values, it can allow human values to flourish unconstrained by natural law. The Universe is a dark and foreboding place, suspended between alien deities. Cthulhu, Gnon, Moloch, call them what you will.
Somewhere in this darkness is another god. He has also had many names. In the Kushiel books , his name was Elua. He is the god of flowers and free love and all soft and fragile things. Of art and science and philosophy and love. Of niceness, community, and civilization. He is a god of humans. What a weakling! This is going to be so easy!
But somehow Elua is still here. No one knows exactly how. And the gods who oppose Him tend to find Themselves meeting with a surprising number of unfortunate accidents. So be it with Gnon.
Our job is to placate him insofar as is necessary to avoid starvation and invasion. And that only for a short time, until we come into our full power. My answer is: Moloch is exactly what the history books say he is. He is the god of child sacrifice, the fiery furnace into which you can toss your babies in exchange for victory in war.
He always and everywhere offers the same deal: throw what you love most into the flames, and I can grant you power. So we need to close the offer. Only another god can kill Moloch. We have one on our side, but he needs our help. We should give it to him.
I am luckier than Ginsberg. I got to see the best minds of my generation identify a problem and get to work. One somewhat rambling thought I took away from this post, oddly enough, is that — in the face of a potential superintelligence — the status quo is not the only alternative to trying to build a Friendly AI.
Democracy, monarchism, and a designed-to-be-Friendly AI can be compared according to the risk aversion one should adopt in the face of Moloch. A monarchy promises the ability to impose mutually beneficial coordination from above — but can produce highly unpredictable results, leading to tyranny, civil wars, revolutions, etc. A designed-to-be-Friendly AI promises the possibility of optimization of all of our values, but the orthogonality thesis shows the fragility of any attempt to make one truly friendly.
The only response to the threat of annihilation need not be one that has the power to annihilate as well. I imagine though I think a substantial portion of the readership would disagree that any political system with even vague autocratic tendencies could be convinced to regulate the possibility of a super-human AI out of existence.
The relevant questions for this tradeoff: 1. How likely is a superintelligence will be built by Moloch, if nothing is done — one that would cause not just despair but annihilation? How likely is it that a designed-to-be-Friendly AI could be built with confidence before Moloch finishes its superintelligence? EDIT: the estimations are mostly here for fun — I think the questions are the important part. I make no claim to being well-calibrated. Ah, but super-human AI is not the only way Moloch can bring our demise.
How many such dangers can your global monarch identify in time? Just it took very little effort and seemed like it would make people happy. It seems to me that except in the last case and maybe even then all those methods are self defeating. They will simply cause selection in favour of those that ignore the incentives. I come from a religious Family of 11 and very much doubt any incentive could have swayed my parents.
Edit: Indeed I think that it would likely have a negative result from your point of view. People such as my parents or myself would never accept being sterilized at any incentive but plenty of people who would likely only have had a couple of kids anyway might.
That still seems like an improvement compared to the status quo. In the short run maybe. It also, however, hastens the slide to a state of affairs where the world population is composed overwhelmingly from descendants of people who have large families thus heavily selecting for the genes or hereditary memes that want large families. It seems that any progress you make in the short run with this technique will be undone in the long run.
That seems counterproductive to me. Those who think a malthusian scenario is ultimately unavoidable may well take the little extra incentive. But also those with poor impulse control or inability to connect cause and effect. Hence my support for more birth control and abortions.
Deciding for others which genes deserve to survive to the next generation, is probably the question you are least objective about. How can you pretend to set yourself as judge over genes your own genes compete with? Being born in poverty, being born to abusive parents, etc, is bad for them, and parental licensing would ameliorate that. I care about humanity surviving and people being happy beyond my lifetime.
But why should it stop there? Well, that is evident. Why not beat them to it, butcher a few sacred cows yourself, and become a laughing lion hedonist with no care in the world? Harald, I know damn well what my soul is. I have stared the damn thing in the face and been forced to acknowledge it. That would definitely reduce the probability that I take over the universe.
Many ex-Quiverfull kids have only one or two children. If there were a chemical — odorless, tasteless, hypoallergenic — whose only effect would be to make people want to have no more than one child, would you dump that chemical into the water supply?
I would. Chemical resistance? Bacteria breed about a million times faster than us and they still have trouble evolving resistance to our chemical weapons. Antibiotics are relatively straightforward things: bind to these sites, disrupt this metabolic pathway, and the bacterium dies.
Such a chemical is unlikely to be found, and conditional on such a thing being discovered it is unlikely to work perfectly. Similarly, unlike in antibiotics we are unlikely to find multiple such chemicals with different mechanisms.
Although the cached thought behind that comment is not quite applicable in that context, I still think it is relevant in this discussion. That humans breed much more slowly means that human evolution should much easier to defeat. Memetics will win that arms race.
Amish retention rates have increased over time by some pretty significant amounts. Sorry blacktrance — that would interfere with currently ongoing attempt to breed the perfect client for the progressive state. One who is violent and hostile to outsiders so can control territory where unlimited votes can be mined in times of need. One who will breed young and with low parental investment so that the children can parasitize resources away from the more expensive to raise children of the enemy.
To expect God to care about you or your personal values or the values of your civilization, that is hubris. To expect God to bargain with you, to allow you to survive and prosper as long as you submit to Him, that is hubris. We need to kill God and take His stuff.
In all seriousness: where do I sign up? And what do I have to offer? Then destroy all the souls in Hell, if no other mercy can be given them than annihilation. Then I start reading angelology and demonology and get bored and write something else. It may not be quite what you are looking for, but someone has already written a lengthy piece of fiction about what would happen if Hell decided to invade earth and drag off everybody there.
Read in order, chapterwise. Yes, I second this. Naturalist warm fuzzies and Crowning Moments Of Awesome all around. I loved The Salvation War. On the other hand, it wants to be the story of how humans faced off in a world-threatening struggle against Satan, Prince of Darkness, Father of Lies, etc etc, ruler of the Nine Circles of Hell. The Father of Lies is a serious concern because, well, he lies , which implies extensive knowledge of human thoughts and desires and current state and how to argue and so forth, whereas the ogres featured in TSW seem to be utterly clueless about what the humans are up to.
Revealing that minor spoiler gur fhpphov ner eryrnfvat curebzbarf naq pna or pbhagrenpgrq jvgu nvepbaqvgvbavat has the same problem of reducing the capabilities of the ogres to brute force, rather than any kind of skill or control. Demons are supposed to tempt. Demons are supposed to know what humans want. It jars terribly. Related to the ogres-not-demons complaint is my impression that Hell is carrying an idiot ball regarding wider knowledge of what the humans are up to.
First because human society did frequently change faster — consider the Ottoman Empire, which expanded from Anatolia to seize Jerusalem, Alexandria and Mecca in a generation.
Or the rise of Charlemagne, or Alexander the Great. Or the Mongols. But no tactic the demons try is allowed to have even temporary success, except the lava flows.
I got the impression from the Open Thread that you had a thing for game design. Becoming dumber and less insightful was a survival mechanism. I had already updated in favor of Scott being a budding Supervillian. If he starts taking minions, I shall have to do so again. Nah, a bald psychiatrist from the decadent American Northeast who collects books in a cryptic language, is an expert in all kinds of mind-altering drugs, and talks about killing God would hardly make a good villain.
Actually, a bald psychiatrist with an expertise in mind-altering drugs sounds VERY supervillainy. All of them, down to the babies in the cradle. But Moloch is strong, and Enki is weak, and the nameless god was wounded in the war — he lives on in the shadows and at the furthest remove, he wears the mask of Elua or Mammon, and when the cult of Cthulhu tries to call him up and harness his power, they lose him entirely and get Moloch instead.
Granted, this is a lot easier with eleven million people rather than million. The graph where, out of a population of , a mere Absolutists so thoroughly outperform everyone else that everyone else becomes an Absolutist before the game is half over is eye-opening.
Scott, this is probably the best thing you have ever written. It is beautiful and terrible and true. It seems implausible that the western college-educated liberal cluster would be more human than everyone else. Are they values that the rest of the world would share if they had the spare resources that we do? Something else entirely? Once the selection pressure for these taboos lets up most likely because of bountiful resources they quickly dissolve away.
Basically, if we feel secure we allow the better parts of our nature to come out. I think I should respect what people chose to do with their lives. But I feel no such obligation for meta-values. If someone else disagrees with me and thinks that burning gay people alive is the way to go I have no obligation whatsoever to respect that.
Why the requirement to shun people who shun people? Tolerate anything, including intolerant beliefs. Punish only those who attempt to inflict their will on other people directly.
There is no scenario in which an alternative to that situation would cause both an improvement in my freedom of action, AND less or equal effort, AND less or equal risk. Not doing so, on the other hand, is a very minor effort which gathers to me the sort of people who also do not shun people, who are therefore quite useful.
Seconding Geirr; I believe this may very well be your magnum opus. Keep in mind that the plausibility of your plan to kill Gnon depends on hard take-off being possible.
Superintelligence alone is not enough; a gradual slide into superintelligence will simply be corrupted by the horsemen. Even hard take-off can be threatened by competitive pressures. Imagine several teams working on FAI. And imagine that the team which is willing to be a little looser with its utility function can launch one month earlier than the rest. Which brings us back to the question of just what values the FAI is supposed to implement.
Or freaking anybody. The Joker is basically my Elua. Actually, I might need to make that a new tumblr tag. Goodbye Malthus, goodbye Moloch, enter a new age of art and love and peace and joy.
That kind of statement just makes your values look more attractive for baking into my superintelligence. In the final analysis? I would LOVE to see the face of someone turn on a superintelligence which had my values.
I would be laughing for all of the week or so in which I and other human beings still existed before being disassembled for parts of a matrioshka brain.
I certainly think attempts to build a utilitarian FAI are misguided. Human values are aesthetic, not utilitarian. This is the root reason why utilitarians reject hedonium in favor of Coherent Extrapolated Volition — a hedonium universe is ugly. Keep on the good writing Scott! The more complexity an entity or society contains, the more opportunities there are for coordination to pay off.
Our present wealth and diversity implies also vastly increased opportunity for coordination. Whales are optimal with more anticancer systems than mice. Rich developed nations can afford more coordination mechanisms than hunter-gatherer tribes. We can see this in recent technology. Consider Kickstarter, blogs, Hangouts, Wikipedia, schedule coordination on Google Calendar, or African farmers getting text messages with current market prices for their various crops.
We can perform feats of coordination now that were impossible, even inconceivable, thirty years ago. So if you want to beat Moloch, the answer may already be out there, if we can just figure how to adapt or scale up some of these new tools. Coordination is not a miracle that falls from the sky. Kickstarter is a tool. Wikipedia is a tool. Coordination is produced by technologies and tools, just like other things are. Imagine what we can do if and when we add in even a little contract-enforcement capacity into our new coordination tools.
That looks an awful lot like the ability to get people to mutually contract to pay taxes to pay for any social goal they like. Including, say, security officers to enforce prior contracts. So our existing coordination platforms are already pretty darn close to being able to reproduce existing government, for example.
We live in an age of burgeoning coordination platforms. I am also a super huge fan of Kickstarter as hopefully the next level of coordination technology and tried to get people to build it before I knew it existed.
The idea is to use the incentive-distorting effects of these bets in a positive way to fund public goods. Now people feel no guilt about breaking plans at the last possible second because they can use fancy communication technology to inform the person without ever having to speak to them. If people routinely cancel on you for no good reason…that probably says more about how much they actually want to see you than about the convenience of the technology.
Certainly not my experience, though it probably varies by social circle. I wonder if any studies have been done on this? The Cochran-Ewald view is that cancer is most likely caused by pathogens rather than mutations which are random outcomes for each cell.
0コメント